Children’s Hearings in Scotland

BBC Newsnight on 3/8/2018 drew attention to concerns that the Child Protection Service in Norway is taking too many children into care.

The same concerns should be publicized in Scotland.  The British media has publicised ‘separation anxiety’ experienced by children being separated from their parents at the American-Mexico border. The same British media is behind the curve in discussing the separation of children from their parents in the UK.

In short, social workers produce reports that Children’s Hearing Panels do not and cannot challenge, because they are not trained to challenge them and they have no evidence with which to contradict social workers’ reports.  These ‘reports’ are actually judgments by those who are not trained to be judges, with devastating effects upon the families that they destroy.  Their inability to produce balanced reports can be demonstrated in various ways, not least by their refusal to interview all parties involved whenever they document one of the many complaints they are adept at recording.

The forms given to social workers to fill in are biassed in favour of reporting negative events so that Children’s Hearing Panels read biassed reports full of complaints against the parent that the social worker has decided to focus on.

Such a nay-saying job must be depressing and stressful to conscientious social workers, so it is in everyone’s interests to improve the service.

The best way to improve it is to put resources into helping struggling parents instead of taking children away from them and paying through the nose for others to look after these children.

There is a petition before the Public Petitions Committee of the Scottish Parliament on the Operation and running of child protection services in Scotland.  It began in November 2017 and the statistics supplied to the Committee are alarming, both in terms of the shocking outcomes of children in care in Scotland and the amount of money being wasted in care that would be better spent on supporting parents.

  1. On statistics: these outcomes are not easily discovered, and Kezia Dugdale, MSP, former leader of the Scottish Labour Party, said that the lack of information recorded about young people in care “should make all of us angry”, describing the figures she had managed to obtain as “startling and deeply worrying”.  She was speaking at the launch of a report Falling Through the Cracks, highlighting that at least 84 young people died in the last 10 years, who had been in secure care at some stage.  The statistics in the above Petition claims that 20% of children who have been in care in Scotland will not see their 25th birthday, and that 25% of children who have been in care have police records by the age of 25.  Submissions are available on the Scottish Parliament website.
  2. On money: a similar concern was highlighted on HARDtalk only a few days ago on 2 Aug 2018 about Ireland’s forced adoptions showing that money is integral to the adoption business.  Paul Redmond claimed that Roman Catholic nuns in Ireland had been trading in adoptions, being paid to send children to the United States for adoption often against the mother’s wishes and sometimes without her knowledge.
  3. In England, the share price of some of the private adoption agencies continues to rise at a surprising rate.

Baroness Hale, the President of the UK Supreme Court, said recently that a legal case about family freedom brought by the Christian Institute is a ‘most important’ case.  The unanimous verdict of the UK Supreme Court in 2016 prevented the Scottish SNP Government from implementing its Named Person scheme, that gives more rights to a state-appointed Named Person than a child’s own parents.  This goes beyond the nanny state and it is a piece of communist ideology promoted by secularists who think that the state owns the nation’s children.

It is time for Christian common sense to be brought to bear upon the Children’s Hearing system in Scotland.


Experts in Child Law in England consider secrecy in England has been taken too far and should not be protected from public scrutiny.

16 May 2018: I drew attention to the need for grandparents to be involved who are being denied family rights on The Kaye Adams’ Programme on BBC Radio Scotland. It is interesting that whereas there is a summary of the programmes before and after this one, there is no subject matter summary about this episode on the BBC website.

15 Feb 2019: BBC news reported a successful Appeal to the Supreme Court by a mother against her child being taken into care. The BBC said that a record number of children are in care in England and Wales and that “often the reasons for putting children in care is shrouded in secrecy”. In this case the Court of Appeal called it “the slimmest of evidence”. The mother was scathing of the system and said that they are “a law unto themselves” and that one cannot challenge them because they are shrouded in secrecy. The solution is to open up the family courts. The report is not available on the BBC website.

8 Jun 2019: I gave my recommendations today to the Chair of the Independent Care Review. I recommended 1. in an emergency situation, instead of removing the child from the family home, to put a suitably trained supernanny into the home to assess the situation and neutralise the risk; 2. spread the risk from a social worker fearful of losing their job if something goes wrong on their watch to involve the family, grandparents in particular, and restore the balance of family rights according to the European Convention of Human Rights Article 8; 3. review Children’s Hearing Panels’ training to restore these meetings to ‘informal round-table discussions’ instead of the legal battlefield that they are at present; 4. before a child can be removed from the family home, there must be adequate advocacy for all concerned in a multi-disciplinary consensus and 5. a list of other recommendations including my submission to a Public Petition being considered by the Public Petitions Committee at the Scottish Parliament.

“these are meant to be informal round-table discussions with only the people present who can make a meaningful contribution to the debate.”

UK Supreme Court [2010] UKSC 56 para 45

18 Jun 2019: a Government Commissioned Review about children separated from their jailed mothers has just published its report.

Harriet Harman MP, Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, said on the BBC news today that it is a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) because the child has a right to family life.

The application of the ECHR is under review in two areas: 1. the children of female prisoner as above and 2. under immigration policy.

It is time that it was reviewed in the Child Welfare system in Scotland where children are removed by Children’s Hearing Panels from mothers who are not criminals. These Panels were originally set up to take criminal offenders out of the adult criminal system, but the majority of cases are now no longer criminal and involve greater medical skills involving mental health than social workers are able to provide. The recently announced decision to train school teachers to recognise mental health issues is long overdue in the Children’s Hearing system relying upon reports from social workers poorly-trained in mental health, learning difficulties and deaf awareness and other disabilities.

I wrote today to David Gauke, MP, the Secretary of State for Justice, that the European Convention on Human Rights to family life is being routinely ignored in Scotland. I have previously mentioned the same to various Sheriffs and to the Sheriff Principal of Grampian, Highland and Islaands. The subject needs more public discussion and I await the outcome.

27 Jun 2019: an example of abusing parents in the Scottish child welfare system.

26 Jul 2019: Child welfare and equal access to justice I wrote to Jacob Rees-Mogg MP, the new Leader of the House of Commons: ‘In your first Business Statement to the House of Commons you expressed your dismay at a child being deprived of its mother. “The treatment that Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe has had to undergo is shameful and must be so distressing. When the hon. Lady talks about her child—a five-year-old—being deprived of a mother, that is the most awful thing that one can imagine. I have the greatest sympathy and yes, of course I will take this matter up.” I was pleased to hear this sentiment but I draw to your attention that this very act occurs in the UK under the forced adoption procedures encouraged by social workers both in England and Scotland. … I trust that you will acquaint yourself with the legalised stealing of children from their parents at ‘the say-so’ of social workers throughout the UK. EDM #301 on 1/9/2014 refers to historic abuse but this is an on-going issue as expressed here by the Chair of the Association of Lawyers for Children. … It is only too easy for social workers to believe and act upon false accusations resulting in children being separated from their families here in the UK as surely as in Iran. … in your first occasion at the despatch box: “I absolutely believe that one of the founding principles of our nation is that justice is blind and there is equal justice for everybody.” Justice is only available to the rich and the poor who have access to Legal Aid. Middle-income families do not have equal access to justice.

19 Sep 2019: the SNP Scottish Government has now dropped its Named Person policy, and not before time.

27 Dec 2019: Baroness Hale, retiring president of the Supreme Court, indicates that access to justice is the main need, and that the problem was particularly evident in family courts. The inequality is discussed here.

31 Oct 2020: justice requires advocacy.

30 Nov 2020: advocacy begins with parenting.

19 Dec 2020: although the Named Person has been dropped, its structures and procedures are very much alive and in a school near you. This sleight of hand reminds us of the Treaty of Lisbon, which was the European Union’s method of getting round the fact that the voters of France and the Netherlands had rejected the attempt to alter the European Constitution. The SNP Government is slowly implementing a Police State. The Scottish Police Federation has warned that the Hate Crime Bill proposals would force officers to “police what people think or feel” which it says would “devastate the legitimacy of the police in the eyes of the public”. This demonstrates the inability of the SNP Government to draft sensible legislation and it is a danger to civil freedoms. Like a mad man wielding a knife, we need to disarm the SNP Government from making legislation by voting it out at the next election.

25 Dec 2020: Sky News reported a large jump in adoptions in England during the coronavirus pandemic lockdown. Online interviews instead of home visits was described as improving the ‘efficiency’ of the procedure!

26 Dec 2020: a film by Ian Mitchell, which accuses the SNP Hate Crime Bill of working towards a Police State and that Justice Minister Humza Yousaf was himself guilty of aggravated hate speech. It points out the possibility and danger of children being used to police parental thoughts and behaviour.

9 Jan 2021: child spies proposed for UK legislation.

22 Mar 2023: Scottish Parliament apology for Forced Adoption in Scotland over many decades from the 1950s to the 1970s. Another pledge to implement the Independent Care Review “the promise of keeping families together” repeated here, but still to be implemented. I do not know how this impacts upon Children’s Hearing Panels today but it has failed thus far, as demonstrated by the Independent Care Review Report.

See the comments below.

4 thoughts on “Children’s Hearings in Scotland

  1. James A Mackie

    An excellent blog that speaks for all those children and families who have experienced “child protection” in Scotland. The Independent Care Review interviewed over 5500 people, more than half of whom had experience of the system in Scotland. Its conclusion was that the whole system in Scotland needed an overhaul and replaced by a far better system Unfortunately the Review states that it will take 10 years to change the current system. 10 months is too long. We have a current system that has too many with vested interests in keeping it going and 129 MSP who have little or no knowledge or experience of how the system in Scotland works and do not appear to be interested in speaking to those who have experienced the system. An example of the misuse of legislation is that parents/families are now being charged with assault if they are seen grabbing an errant child by the clothing to prevent that child coming to harm.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.