In his inaugural address on 19/3/2013, the new pope of Rome Francis finished by praying to the dead. He said: “I implore the intercession of the Virgin Mary, Saint Joseph, Saints Peter and Paul, and Saint Francis that the Holy Spirit may accompany my ministry…” So he thinks that the Holy Spirit is in their gift to do as they please. It would be better to pray to the Lord Jesus Christ, the only Mediator between God and man 1Tim 2:5, instead of to those who cannot hear him. Jesus said: “I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever” Jn 14:16.

In his mass for 23/4/2013, Francis said: “It is not possible to find Jesus outside the Church” and “you cannot believe in Jesus without the Church.” Pity the thief on the Cross who had Jesus beside him but no Church to help him. The apostle Peter had just denied his Lord and was nowhere to be found. Thankfully, Jesus was up to the task and assured him: “Today, you shall surely be with Me in paradise” Lk 23:43.

The new pope of Rome’s reforms does not include the doctrine of purgatory.

The Vatican offers ‘time off purgatory‘ to followers of pope Francis’ tweets.

Purgatory is a figment of the Roman Catholic imagination and is not found in the teaching of Scripture. Its practice and teaching contributed to the Protestant Reformation when Martin Luther criticised the money being raised from the sale of masses to get people out of this imaginary purgatory.

Recently there were indications that purgatory was being revised. This latest scam does not suggest any progress has been made, and it simply manipulates the religious sensibilities of Roman Catholics.

The announcement is in relation to the papal visit to Brazil, the country with the largest number of Roman Catholics, at which various indulgences can be obtained by attendance at events such as the Catholic World Youth Day, in Rio de Janeiro. The Christian church does not need such manipulation of man’s religious conscience.

18/7/2013 USA Today

Today, 24th December 2010, the pope of Rome broadcast a message to the British people on BBC Radio 4’s “Thought For The Day”, the day before the Queen’s traditional broadcast to the nation. It made the news as it is the first time a Roman pontiff has done so.

The BBC news reported this as his personal way of saying ‘Thank you’ to the United Kingdom. If so, then why did he chose to miss out Northern Ireland from his message? He said: “Dear Friends from Scotland, England, Wales and indeed every part of the English-speaking world, I want you to know that I keep all of you very much in my prayers during this Holy Season.” Is the rider about “the English-speaking world” to disguise the fact that the Vatican does not recognise Northern Ireland as part of the United Kingdom?

As usual, his theology is erroneous. He says about Jesus: “He was to be the Saviour of all people throughout the world and throughout history. And it was not a political liberation that he brought, achieved through military means: rather, Christ destroyed death for ever and restored life by means of his shameful death on the Cross.”

If we did not know more of Roman Catholic theology, one would assume from these pious platitudes that Ratzinger is a universalist – someone who believes that everyone will go to heaven.

First, if “Christ destroyed death for ever”, what has happened to hell? Is Rome changing its mind about hell just as it has changed its mind about limbo? BBC2 screened a programme Limbo Babies in early December 2010 which highlighted Roman Catholic theology that babies who die before being baptised cannot be buried with their family in Roman consecrated ground. Neither do they go to heaven, but to limbo. For centuries, parents with stillborn children were told that they would be eternally separated from them. The programme highlighted the unjustified shame that such parents felt as they buried their stillborn children in anonymous, unmarked graves – away from their families’ burial ground. The psychological damage is easy to imagine. Romanism has recently modified its doctrine of limbo, but not before countless numbers of Roman Catholic mothers have suffered through the centuries by this doctrine.

Now the pope of Rome tells us “Christ has destroyed death forever”. If so, then there is no hell and no limbo. Is Rome about to change its mind about hell as well? Does Ratzinger not mean destroyed death “for Roman Catholics” and some select others? Is he being economical with the truth, or is the explanation simply that the words sound nicer without the qualification? This is doublespeak – from the pope of Rome.

Secondly, if He is “the Saviour of all people”, then why does anyone need to be a Roman Catholic to escape a non-existent hell? Why do we need the pope of Rome? Why do we need Christianity? It is no wonder that atheists are so easily running rings round Romanism.

Joseph Ratzinger, the pope of Rome, travelled from Edinburgh to celebrate a Roman Catholic mass in Bellahouston Park, Glasgow.  About 65-70,000 people attended, which contrasts with the 250,000 who turned out at the same location in 1982 to see pope John Paul II (which has been claimed to be the largest religious service ever held in Scotland).

The speeches reveal why this date was chosen – it was “the feast of St Ninian”.  The pope of Rome possibly aspires to be in line with Ninian, who was one of the earliest Christian missionaries in Scotland and who is known as the Apostle of the Southern Picts.   Rome wishes to lay claim to Scotland, just as his beatifying of John Henry Newman on British soil is Ratzinger’s manner of laying claim to England.  The timing of the visit can be viewed also as an attempt to trump any celebration of the 450th anniversary of the Scottish Reformation of religion in May 1560.

One BBC commentator suggested that he was in Edinburgh as a head of state, and in Glasgow he celebrated the Roman mass as head of the Roman Catholic communion.  In this sense, Glasgow was given more prominence than Edinburgh, and he was evidently more relaxed in a place where he was top dog.

Idolatry

The rock concert stage set-up in Bellahouston Park had the added feature of a gruesome crucifix prominently displayed on stage, highlighting the Roman Catholic adoration of images – just as the BBC would later on Saturday night concentrate its cameras on the Roman monstrance during the papal mass at the vigil in Hyde Park, London.  Roman Catholics believe the monstrance contains the actual body and blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ, and this is displayed for them to adore.  A crucifix is not an empty cross, a symbol used by many Christians, but a cross with the image of a man supposed to represent Christ, contrary to the second of the Ten Commandments which forbids making images for worship.  Roman Catholics explain away the second commandment by including it under the first commandment, thereby trying to justify the worship of God by images.  This necessitates a re-numbering of the Ten Commandments so that the tenth commandment about coveting is split in two.  So when a person quotes “Thou shalt not kill” as the fifth commandment, you know he/she is a Roman Catholic.

Rewriting history

In his speech of welcome, Mario Conti, Roman archbishop of Glasgow, mentioned the execution of John Ogilvy in the middle of a list beginning with Ninian and ending with John Henry Newman.  He said that he was “hanged for his obedience to the Holy See”.  It is true that he was a martyr for the papacy, but he was actually hanged for treason.  The martyrdom theme was mentioned again in London speeches.  Roman progress in Britain was the theme, as Conti reminded his audience that David, the son of Roman Catholic saint and Scottish Queen Margaret, “revived the ancient bishoprics”.

Roman authority

The theatrics of the occasion included putting the mitre on and off Ratzinger’s head.  The BBC commentator explained that the pope of Rome takes his mitre off for higher authority, so what does it mean when it was replaced on his head before the reading of the epistle of Paul to the Romans 12:3-13?  It is part of the pope of Rome’s delusion of grandeur that he considers himself to be above all earthly authority and, as this symbolism shows, above the Word of God.  Such delusion gives force to Richard Dawkins’ diatribe against religion.

The sacrifice of the Roman mass
As Ratzinger bowed to the crucifix and circumambulated his altar waving incense in the air, some incense was put on him.  The BBC narrator explained that he was ‘incensed’ by a deacon – rather the audience should be incensed that walking about with incense can be considered a serious act of worship to the living God.  He prayed that “our sacrifice may be acceptable to God” and then this modern pope of Rome celebrated mass in Latin.  Mario Conti at his right hand continued in Latin also – to the enlightenment of some of the assembled masses who recited the collective Lord’s Prayer in Latin (Pater noster).  So as to be left in no doubt, the crowd was told that “this is the Lamb of God” as the white-robed officials handed out communion, with a plate held below the chin of the recipient of Ratzinger’s wafers to ensure that none of their sacred host was dropped on the ground.

Mesmerised
This visit was an attempt to put a Roman Catholic stamp upon the religious and secular affairs of Scotland.  Its mesmerising effect was not lost on Alex Salmond, First Minister of Scotland and leader of the Scottish National Party, who was seated prominently in a front row alongside Nicola Sturgeon, Deputy First Minister.  He commented afterwards: “This was a great day for Scotland.”  Salmond is a Presbyterian who has actively embraced the multifaith agenda and courted the Islamic vote in Scotland.

Nor did it fail to impress David Robertson, editor of The Monthly Record of the Free Church of Scotland, and minister in St Peter’s Church, Dundee.  On his Facebook entry he wrote: “Just been on Radio Scotland to welcome the Pope to Scotland! I honestly think his book on Jesus is one of the best I have ever read. I think he is an intelligent and thoughtful man and I regard him as a Christian brother. I disagree with the office of Papacy and other things. But you have to ask why the militant atheists are so vicious against the Catholic church – because they are the biggest obstacles to the secularisation of our society – in general the Protestant churches have been pathetic in resisting this. I personally thank the Lord for this Pope.”

Ratzinger came across as a mild, old man, which is likely to sway the gullible; but his words were as dogmatic as ever.  John Haldane, the BBC guest with Sally Magnuson, reminded viewers that people thought of Ratzinger as strident, but this showed him to be a gentle man with delicacy and “maybe we should think again”.  This was expanded – his toughness was not hardness of personality but commitment to truth.  So his toughness was acknowledged: but it is not truth but the dogmatism of the papacy which needs to be noted.   As head of the office of the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the Inquisition, Ratzinger was labelled with the nickname of Rottweiler, so that the Roman hierarchy was unsure how he would be received in Britain.   They have been surprised at his positive reception.

What truth?  Secular and/or religious?

In Edinburgh he spoke against militant atheism and told the media to be more responsible; in Glasgow he spoke about the dangers of relativism.  Ratzinger did not fail to use strong language, revealing the iron fist inside the velvet glove.  This secular agenda, with which many could identify, should not hide the religious agenda nor the errors promoted by the Roman papacy.